References

Bolger, Niall, and Jean-Philippe Laurenceau. 2013. Intensive Longitudinal Methods: An Introduction to Diary and Experience Sampling Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Bollen, Kenneth A., and Adamantios Diamantopoulos. 2017. “In Defense of Causal-Formative Indicators: A Minority Report.” Psychological Methods 22 (3): 581–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000056.
Brown, Timothy A. 2015. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. 2nd Ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Cole, David A., and Kristopher J. Preacher. 2014. “Manifest Variable Path Analysis: Potentially Serious and Misleading Consequences Due to Uncorrected Measurement Error.” Psychological Methods 19 (2): 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033805.
Collins, Linda M., and Stephanie T. Lanza. 2009. Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Flake, Jessica Kay, and Eiko I Fried. 2020. “Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 3: 456–65.
Haslam, N., E. Holland, and P. Kuppens. 2012. “Categories Versus Dimensions in Personality and Psychopathology: A Quantitative Review of Taxometric Research.” Psychological Medicine 42 (05): 903–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711001966.
Hussey, Ian, and Sean Hughes. 2020. “Hidden Invalidity Among 15 Commonly Used Measures in Social and Personality Psychology.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 3 (2): 166–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919882903.
Kenny, David A., Deborah A. Kashy, and William L. Cook. 2006. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kim, Hanna, and Jee-Seon Kim. 2022. “Extending the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model to Accommodate Multivariate Dyadic Data Using Latent Variables.” Psychological Methods, October. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000531.
Kline, Rex B. 2023. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 5th Ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Ledgerwood, Alison, and Patrick E. Shrout. 2011. “The Trade-Off Between Accuracy and Precision in Latent Variable Models of Mediation Processes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 (6): 1174–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024776.
Little, Todd D. 2013. Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Nye, Christopher D., and Fritz Drasgow. 2011. “Effect Size Indices for Analyses of Measurement Equivalence: Understanding the Practical Importance of Differences Between Groups.” Journal of Applied Psychology 96 (5): 966–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022955.
Open Science Collaboration. 2015. “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Science 349 (6251): aac4716–16. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.
Pastor, Dena A., Kenneth E. Barron, B. J. Miller, and Susan L. Davis. 2007. “A Latent Profile Analysis of College Students’ Achievement Goal Orientation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 32 (1): 8–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.003.
Rhemtulla, Mijke, Riet Van Bork, and Denny Borsboom. 2020. “Worse Than Measurement Error: Consequences of Inappropriate Latent Variable Measurement Models.” Psychological Methods 25 (1): 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000220.
Rosenberg, Joshua, Patrick Beymer, Daniel Anderson, C.j. Van Lissa, and Jennifer Schmidt. 2018. tidyLPA: An R Package to Easily Carry Out Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) Using Open-Source or Commercial Software.” Journal of Open Source Software 3 (30): 978. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00978.
Rosseel, Yves. 2012. Lavaan : An r Package for Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Statistical Software 48 (2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
Sakaluk, John K., Alexandra N. Fisher, and Robyn E. Kilshaw. 2021a. “Dyadic Measurement Invariance and Its Importance for Replicability in Romantic Relationship Science.” Personal Relationships 28 (1): 190–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12341.
———. 2021b. “Dyadic Measurement Invariance and Its Importance for Replicability in Romantic Relationship Science.” Personal Relationships 28 (1): 190–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12341.
Sakaluk, John Kitchener. 2019. “Expanding Statistical Frontiers in Sexual Science: Taxometric, Invariance, and Equivalence Testing.” The Journal of Sex Research 56 (4-5): 475–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1568377.
Sakaluk, John K., and Stephen D. Short. 2017. “A Methodological Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Sexuality Research: Used Practices, Best Practices, and Data Analysis Resources.” The Journal of Sex Research 54 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1137538.
Spearman, C. 1904. “"General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured.” The American Journal of Psychology 15 (2): 201–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107.
Tabachnick, Barbara G., and Linda S. Fidell. 2012. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. New York, NY: Pearson.
Vazire, Simine, Sarah R. Schiavone, and Julia G. Bottesini. 2022. “Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 31 (2): 162–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211067779.